Fraser Heath Logo | Independent Financial Advisors Bristol


Pensions: death benefits & possible changes to funding limits 

  • By Mark Fletcher
  • 07 Jul, 2016

Nominating pension benefits

Before 6 April 2015, a 55% tax charge was levied on the pension fund of any investor who died while drawing income from their fund under a drawdown contract.

Now, such lump sum payments on death are tax-free if the death occurs before age 75. If later, the beneficiaries will be subject to tax at 45% if the death occurs in the tax year 2015/16 and at their marginal tax rate thereafter.

Those inheriting pension benefits on the death of the investor are in the same position, tax-wise, as the investors themselves. So on deaths before age 75 the benefits can be passed on with no tax charge, from one generation to the next.

The freedom from ‘death tax’ of pension benefits passing after 6 April 2015 is subject to the condition that the beneficiary must either move into ‘flexi-access’ drawdown or take a lump sum payment within two years of the death.

If the intentions of investors and those who inherit pension benefits are to be realised, it is vitally important that they should make clear to the trustees of the pension fund whom they wish to benefit. This is done by filing a ‘nomination’ form with the trustees, which should ideally be accompanied by a ‘letter of wishes’, containing more detailed information such as the effect of any changes in circumstances.

However, births, deaths, marriages and divorces cannot be anticipated and may well affect the choice of beneficiaries. Consequently, nominations and letters of wishes should be reviewed and up-dated regularly.

These two forms of instruction to trustees and not, however, binding, and trustees have an ultimate discretion. If they were binding, they might override the provisions of a Will and result in a tax charge on the beneficiaries.


By-passing the spouse


Before the ‘pension freedoms’ were introduced, it was common practice for pension holders with reasonably substantial pension pots to divert their pension rights away from their surviving spouse if that person had no need of the money and it would be more tax-efficient to pass it directly to children or other dependants. This was done by setting up a ’spousal by-pass trust’.

The fact that pension assets can now be passed between generations free of inheritance tax has caused many people to assume that such trusts will no longer be required. However, they do have their uses, which arise out of the discretion enjoyed by the trustees when distributing benefits.

For example, in the case of second marriages, the interests of children of the first marriage could be protected. Equally, benefits could be withheld from bankrupts or those going through a divorce or in circumstances where means-tested benefits might be affected.

The trust will be effective to divert funds away from the surviving spouse, but it is the nomination and letter of wishes which influence the selection of beneficiaries.

Reducing pension allowance


One of the issues confronting the Government as a result of the new pension freedoms is that people might be tempted to use the income they receive from their pension to make additional contributions, on which they would receive tax relief for a second time.

The annual allowance for pension contributions currently stands at £40,000 p.a., but in order to limit people’s ability to ‘recycle’ pension income, the Government has decreed that in circumstances where any income is drawn from a pension fund under the new ‘flexi-access’ provisions, the allowance will reduce to £10,000. This is referred to as the Money Purchase Annual Allowance (‘MPAA’).

MPAA will not affect ‘capped drawdown’ arrangements, under which the income which can be drawn is restricted by the Government with a view to ensuring that investors do not exhaust their pension pots prematurely.

Also unaffected by MPAA are the investment of tax-free cash from a fund and the application of drawdown funds to purchase an annuity.

Targeting high earners


A proposal from the coalition Government which has been carried forward onto the Conservatives’ agenda is that tax relief on pension contributions should be curtailed for those earning over £150,000 p.a..

Under the proposal, the £40,000 annual allowance would be reduced by £1 for every £2 of income over £150,000, until, for an income of £210,000 the value of the allowance would reduce by £30,000 to £10,000.




Fraser Heath News

By Mark Fletcher 03 Jan, 2018

The UK equity market retreated in November, only the second month in 2017 where we saw a meaningful fall in the key FTSE 100 Index. Comments made by Mark Carney, following the November Base rate rise, highlighted the Bank’s view that inflation will be a problem for some time to come and how business and consumers react to this will determine the path for the UK economy over the coming months. The Bank said in a statement: “The decision to leave the European Union is having a noticeable impact on the economic outlook.  

By Mark Fletcher 22 Nov, 2017

The Bank of England’s decision at the start of November to raise interest rates for the first time in 10 years was widely expected and caused little initial stir in the markets. Since then the FTSE 100 has fallen a couple of percentage points at the time of writing. Perhaps the combination of negative talk around Brexit combined with the prospect of rising interest rates are starting to bring back a little fear to the market which has, for some time, felt like it has been in a state of complacency.

By Mark Fletcher 01 Nov, 2017

Most commentators expect interest rates in the UK will rise for the first time since July 2007 when the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England next gets together for its monthly meeting on 2nd November 2017. Indeed, Mark Carney said on the BBC Today programme, shortly after the minutes of last month’s meeting were released, “What we have said is that if the economy continues on the track that it has been on - and all the indications are that it is - in the relatively near term you can expect that interest rates will rise”. He went on to say, “We are talking about just easing a bit off the accelerator to keep with the speed limit of the economy”, which has been widely predicted to mean that rate rises will be gradual and measured.

By Mark Fletcher 02 Oct, 2017
There used to be a time when the market would jitter at the slightest bad news story. Nowadays it seems that record breaking storms and a war of words amongst leaders with mass devastation at their fingertips can’t shake the nerves of investors. Which is not to say that markets have been driving forward (the FTSE 100 is, at the time of writing, where it was in the middle of January) but rather there hasn’t been the volatility we have seen in recent years.
By Mark Fletcher 05 Sep, 2017
It’s always the case that news stories like Brexit negotiations stalling, the actions of the North Koreans, the daily travails of the leader of the Western World, terrorist attacks and housing market slowdowns can grip us and make us fear the worst.
By Mark Fletcher 31 Jul, 2017
June was another good month for markets, in general terms, with many of the major developed markets once again flirting with new all-time highs. However, we have a sense that all may not be as it seems.
By Mark Fletcher 01 Jul, 2017
As we can see from the above commentary, markets generally continued to make progress in May despite plenty of uncertainty and conflict around the World.
By Mark Fletcher 01 Jun, 2017

Our reason for showing these graphs is to highlight that the VIX index is trading back at 2007 levels of low volatility while stock markets are at all-time highs. We can no more see the future than anyone else but we do know that when it comes to investing, the most money is often made when every sinew in your body is screaming that it is madness to invest, and that sometimes the opposite is true.

By Mark Fletcher 01 May, 2017
A mixed set of results this month reflects the fact that markets are waiting to see what happens in various political arenas around the Globe. Politics is definitely at the forefront of most news bulletins, whether it be President Trump's latest tweets, the UK government triggering Article 50 or the fight to become the next President in France or Chancellor in Germany.
By Richard Ellis 01 Apr, 2017

It has been a strong start to the year for investment portfolios, mostly driven by signs of continued strength in the US Economy and the promise of more to come under the Trump presidency. Markets always move ahead of the economy so to make money, investors will position portfolios to benefit from what they think is around the corner. But what if the promise does not materialise? One fund manager described this recent wave of enthusiasm as the “Trump Bump” and that this may well be followed by the “Trump Dump” if the new President is unable to deliver on his campaign promises due to lack of support from political colleagues. In this respect, it seems that the failed repeal of Obamacare has given investors pause for thought over the last week or so.

While some asset classes are looking expensive, on an individual basis, there remains optimism amongst fund managers. Those who particularly seek to invest in undervalued, unloved but robust companies can see plenty of scope for increased valuations in their investment pool.

Eight years have now passed since the FTSE 100 hit its Credit Crunch low point. In investor memory, particularly among younger investors, we are getting to the point when the slide that started in summer 2007 down to its nadir risks being forgotten. We don’t know what the future holds but the past tells us that investing needs time on your hands to ride out the tough times. We’re confident that investing remains the best long term strategy for your money but make sure that you understand the strategy you are taking and that your portfolio is right for your attitude to investment risk and your time frame.

More Posts
Share by: